@felipahare566
Profile
Registered: 6 months, 2 weeks ago
How Time Planning Training Is Useless in Poorly-Run Organizations
Stop Teaching People to "Prioritize" When Your Organization Has No Idea What Really Matters: Why Task Planning Training Is Useless in Chaotic Organizations
I'll about to dismantle one of the greatest widespread false beliefs in corporate training: the idea that showing staff more effective "task management" techniques will solve time management problems in workplaces that have no consistent direction themselves.
After extensive experience of consulting with companies on efficiency problems, I can tell you that time management training in a dysfunctional company is like showing someone to arrange their belongings while their home is currently burning down around them.
This is the basic reality: most businesses experiencing from efficiency crises do not have productivity challenges - they have organizational problems.
Conventional time planning training presupposes that companies have well-defined, reliable priorities that staff can learn to recognize and work toward. That belief is totally separated from reality in nearly all modern companies.
We consulted with a significant marketing firm where staff were constantly complaining about being "failing to organize their work properly." Leadership had invested enormous amounts on priority planning training for every employees.
This training included all the typical techniques: priority systems, ABC categorization methods, calendar management techniques, and complex project organization systems.
Yet performance kept to decline, employee overwhelm rates got higher, and client quality results turned more unreliable, not better.
When I investigated what was genuinely going on, I discovered the actual cause: the company itself had no stable priorities.
This is what the daily experience looked like for workers:
Monday: Senior executives would declare that Client A was the "top objective" and everyone should to work on it immediately
The next day: A another senior executive would send an "critical" communication stating that Project B was actually the "top important" objective
Day three: Another different team manager would schedule an "immediate" session to declare that Project C was a "must-have" deadline that had to be finished by Friday
Thursday: The initial executive manager would express frustration that Project A had not advanced as expected and insist to know why people had not been "working on" it properly
By week's end: Each three clients would be behind, several deadlines would be failed, and employees would be held responsible for "inadequate time management abilities"
This scenario was occurring constantly after week, month after month. No level of "task management" training was going to assist staff navigate this management insanity.
The fundamental issue wasn't that employees did not learn how to organize - it was that the agency itself was entirely incapable of establishing stable strategic focus for more than 72 hours at a time.
We persuaded management to abandon their concentration on "employee task organization" training and rather establish what I call "Strategic Priority Management."
Instead of working to train staff to organize within a dysfunctional organization, we concentrated on establishing genuine company priorities:
Established a single senior management group with specific power for setting and preserving strategic direction
Implemented a systematic initiative assessment process that took place on schedule rather than whenever someone felt like it
Established specific criteria for when projects could be changed and what level of authorization was necessary for such modifications
Established mandatory notification procedures to make certain that any project modifications were communicated systematically and consistently across each teams
Implemented protection periods where no project changes were allowed without extraordinary approval
The improvement was remarkable and substantial:
Worker frustration instances fell dramatically as people at last knew what they were required to be focusing on
Efficiency rose by over half within 45 days as staff could genuinely work on finishing tasks rather than constantly switching between conflicting requests
Project delivery times got better considerably as teams could coordinate and complete projects without constant disruptions and redirection
Customer satisfaction increased significantly as deliverables were consistently finished as promised and to specification
That point: prior to you teach staff to organize, make sure your organization actually has clear direction that are worth focusing on.
Let me share another approach that priority planning training fails in poorly-run organizations: by presupposing that workers have actual authority over their time and responsibilities.
The team worked with a government organization where workers were continuously getting criticized for "inadequate priority organization" and mandated to "time management" training courses.
The truth was that these staff had almost absolutely no authority over their daily activities. This is what their average day seemed like:
Approximately three-fifths of their time was consumed by mandatory meetings that they were not allowed to skip, irrespective of whether these conferences were relevant to their real work
A further one-fifth of their time was dedicated to completing bureaucratic forms and paperwork tasks that provided absolutely no usefulness to their actual work or to the citizens they were supposed to assist
This final 20% of their workday was meant to be dedicated for their core responsibilities - the work they were paid to do and that actually made a difference to the agency
Additionally even this limited amount of time was continuously invaded by "urgent" demands, unexpected meetings, and management obligations that had no option to be postponed
With these circumstances, zero level of "time management" training was going to assist these staff become more productive. Their issue wasn't their employee priority management techniques - it was an organizational system that rendered productive activity virtually impossible.
The team worked with them create systematic changes to resolve the actual obstacles to efficiency:
Removed redundant conferences and implemented strict standards for when conferences were actually required
Streamlined paperwork tasks and eliminated unnecessary documentation procedures
Implemented dedicated time for actual work activities that couldn't be invaded by meetings
Created clear systems for determining what qualified as a real "urgent situation" versus standard requests that could be planned for appropriate times
Created delegation approaches to guarantee that work was distributed appropriately and that zero individual was carrying excessive load with impossible workloads
Worker effectiveness increased substantially, professional happiness increased notably, and the department finally began providing better services to the public they were meant to help.
The crucial point: organizations can't solve productivity problems by teaching employees to function more effectively productively within broken structures. Companies must improve the systems initially.
At this point let's address possibly the biggest absurd component of task planning training in chaotic workplaces: the belief that employees can somehow organize responsibilities when the company at leadership level modifies its priorities numerous times per day.
I worked with a IT company where the founder was well-known for going through "innovative" insights multiple times per week and expecting the whole company to right away redirect to accommodate each new idea.
Employees would arrive at the office on regularly with a defined understanding of their objectives for the week, only to find that the leadership had determined suddenly that everything they had been concentrating on was not important and that they should to right away start working on something completely new.
That pattern would happen numerous times per month. Projects that had been declared as "highest priority" would be abandoned mid-stream, departments would be repeatedly moved to new projects, and massive quantities of effort and energy would be wasted on projects that were never delivered.
Their company had poured significantly in "flexible project management" training and advanced task management tools to help employees "adjust quickly" to changing directions.
But absolutely no degree of education or tools could solve the basic challenge: you won't be able to effectively prioritize perpetually changing directions. Continuous shifting is the antithesis of good prioritization.
We helped them establish what I call "Strategic Direction Consistency":
Implemented scheduled priority review cycles where major priority changes could be evaluated and implemented
Created firm criteria for what constituted a legitimate reason for changing established objectives outside the planned planning sessions
Created a "priority protection" period where no modifications to established objectives were permitted without emergency circumstances
Implemented defined coordination protocols for when priority changes were really necessary, with complete cost evaluations of what work would be interrupted
Required written approval from senior leaders before any major strategy changes could be enacted
The improvement was remarkable. In a quarter, measurable work delivery statistics increased by over dramatically. Worker stress rates decreased substantially as people could at last focus on completing work rather than continuously initiating new ones.
Product development actually increased because groups had adequate time to fully implement and refine their solutions rather than repeatedly moving to new directions before anything could be properly finished.
This point: successful planning demands priorities that keep consistent long enough for teams to genuinely concentrate on them and accomplish significant progress.
This is what I've discovered after years in this industry: task planning training is merely useful in companies that already have their strategic act working properly.
When your company has consistent strategic direction, realistic demands, functional management, and systems that support rather than hinder efficient work, then priority organization training can be beneficial.
But if your company is defined by perpetual dysfunction, competing messages, incompetent organization, unrealistic expectations, and emergency decision-making styles, then task organization training is worse than pointless - it's actively damaging because it holds responsible personal behavior for leadership dysfunction.
Stop squandering money on priority management training until you've fixed your leadership direction initially.
Start creating organizations with stable business priorities, competent decision-making, and processes that really enable productive activity.
Your workers can manage tasks extremely well once you provide them direction suitable for focusing on and an organization that actually supports them in accomplishing their responsibilities. overburdened with impossible demands
Staff efficiency rose substantially, work satisfaction got better substantially, and this agency finally started providing better results to the citizens they were intended to serve.
The crucial point: organizations cannot fix productivity issues by training employees to work more effectively productively within broken structures. Organizations need to repair the structures initially.
At this point let's discuss perhaps the biggest absurd element of priority management training in chaotic companies: the belief that workers can somehow manage tasks when the organization as a whole changes its focus multiple times per week.
I consulted with a software startup where the founder was notorious for going through "innovative" revelations numerous times per day and demanding the entire organization to instantly pivot to pursue each new idea.
Employees would come at the office on regularly with a clear knowledge of their tasks for the week, only to discover that the leadership had concluded overnight that all work they had been working on was not important and that they needed to right away begin working on an initiative entirely new.
Such cycle would repeat multiple times per month. Work that had been announced as "critical" would be forgotten mid-stream, departments would be constantly re-assigned to different projects, and massive portions of time and energy would be lost on initiatives that were not finished.
The company had invested heavily in "agile project planning" training and sophisticated project tracking tools to enable employees "adjust rapidly" to shifting directions.
But no amount of education or software could overcome the fundamental challenge: people can't effectively prioritize continuously evolving priorities. Constant change is the enemy of effective planning.
We assisted them implement what I call "Strategic Objective Consistency":
Created scheduled strategic review periods where major priority changes could be considered and approved
Developed firm standards for what represented a genuine basis for modifying set objectives beyond the planned planning sessions
Established a "priority consistency" phase where absolutely no changes to set priorities were acceptable without exceptional justification
Created defined coordination systems for when objective modifications were really essential, featuring complete cost evaluations of what projects would be abandoned
Established written sign-off from senior leaders before any significant direction shifts could be implemented
The change was outstanding. In 90 days, actual project completion rates increased by more than three times. Staff burnout rates dropped considerably as employees could at last work on delivering tasks rather than repeatedly starting new ones.
Creativity remarkably increased because departments had sufficient resources to completely develop and test their solutions rather than constantly changing to new initiatives before any work could be properly finished.
The reality: successful planning needs objectives that remain stable long enough for employees to genuinely concentrate on them and accomplish substantial results.
Here's what I've concluded after extensive time in this business: priority organization training is merely useful in workplaces that currently have their organizational priorities working properly.
When your workplace has consistent organizational direction, achievable workloads, functional management, and systems that enable rather than prevent effective performance, then time planning training can be helpful.
However if your workplace is characterized by continuous crisis management, competing messages, inadequate planning, unrealistic workloads, and reactive decision-making styles, then priority planning training is worse than pointless - it's actively damaging because it holds responsible employee choices for systemic dysfunction.
Stop squandering resources on task organization training until you've addressed your organizational direction initially.
Begin establishing companies with clear organizational direction, functional decision-making, and structures that really facilitate meaningful work.
The staff will prioritize just fine once you provide them direction suitable for working toward and an workplace that really supports them in accomplishing their responsibilities.
If you enjoyed this post and you would certainly like to get additional details pertaining to Difficult Persons Training kindly go to our own webpage.
Website: https://teamingupwithcoworkersbrisbane.bigcartel.com/product/teaming-up-with-coworkers-darwin
Forums
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0
Forum Role: Participant