Profile

Registered: 4 months, 3 weeks ago

The True Reason Your Customer Service Training Falls Short: A Hard Assessment

 

The Reason Your Customer Service Team Continues to Disappointing Even After Constant Training

 

Recently, I was sitting in another mind-numbing support seminar in Perth, forced to hear to some trainer ramble about the value of "exceeding customer hopes." Same old presentation, same worn-out phrases, same total gap from the real world.

 

That's when it hit me: we're handling client relations training entirely backwards.

 

Most workshops commence with the idea that terrible customer service is a skills gap. Simply when we could train our people the correct approaches, all problems would automatically get better.

 

Here's the thing: after seventeen years working with companies across the country, I can tell you that techniques aren't the challenge. The problem is that we're demanding people to provide emotional labour without acknowledging the cost it takes on their mental health.

 

Allow me to clarify.

 

Client relations is essentially emotional labour. You're not just solving difficulties or processing requests. You're dealing with other people's anger, handling their anxiety, and magically maintaining your own mental balance while doing it.

 

Traditional training entirely misses this dimension.

 

Rather, it focuses on superficial interactions: how to address customers, how to use upbeat terminology, how to adhere to organisational protocols. All important stuff, but it's like teaching someone to drive by simply describing the concepts without ever letting them near the car.

 

Here's a classic example. A while back, I was working with a large internet company in Adelaide. Their client happiness scores were terrible, and leadership was puzzled. They'd put significant money in thorough education courses. Their people could repeat business procedures perfectly, knew all the correct responses, and performed brilliantly on simulation exercises.

 

But once they got on the customer interactions with actual customers, the system collapsed.

 

The reason? Because actual service calls are unpredictable, charged, and full of factors that can't be addressed in a guidebook.

 

After someone calls raging because their internet's been down for three days and they've missed important professional appointments, they're not interested in your cheerful greeting. They want real acknowledgment of their situation and instant steps to solve their issue.

 

Nearly all support training shows staff to adhere to procedures even when those procedures are totally wrong for the circumstances. It causes artificial interactions that frustrate customers even more and leave team members feeling powerless.

 

For this Adelaide business, we eliminated 90% of their current training materials and commenced again with what I call "Mental Health Training."

 

Instead of training scripts, we taught emotional regulation techniques. Before focusing on company policies, we focused on understanding customer emotions and adapting appropriately.

 

Essentially, we showed staff to identify when they were taking on a customer's anger and how to psychologically protect themselves without becoming disconnected.

 

The changes were immediate and significant. Customer satisfaction scores rose by nearly half in 60 days. But even more importantly, staff satisfaction got better dramatically. People really commenced liking their roles again.

 

Here's another significant challenge I see constantly: workshops that handle each customers as if they're sensible people who just need enhanced communication.

 

It's unrealistic.

 

With extensive time in this business, I can tell you that about 15% of client contacts involve people who are fundamentally problematic. They're not angry because of a real concern. They're experiencing a bad day, they're struggling with private issues, or in some cases, they're just nasty individuals who enjoy causing others endure miserable.

 

Conventional support training doesn't equip staff for these encounters. Instead, it continues the misconception that with enough understanding and ability, all client can be converted into a pleased person.

 

That creates enormous burden on support teams and sets them up for disappointment. When they can't solve an situation with an impossible client, they blame themselves rather than recognising that some situations are plainly unfixable.

 

One company I worked with in Darwin had implemented a rule that customer service staff were not allowed to conclude a conversation until the person was "completely satisfied." Appears reasonable in theory, but in practice, it meant that employees were often trapped in hour-long calls with individuals who had no plan of getting satisfied regardless of what was given.

 

That caused a atmosphere of stress and helplessness among customer service people. Employee satisfaction was astronomical, and the remaining staff who remained were burned out and bitter.

 

The team modified their procedure to add specific guidelines for when it was appropriate to courteously terminate an pointless interaction. This involved teaching employees how to spot the signs of an unreasonable client and offering them with phrases to professionally disengage when necessary.

 

Service quality surprisingly got better because staff were able to spend more quality time with customers who really needed help, rather than being stuck with customers who were just looking to vent.

 

At this point, let's talk about the elephant in the room: performance metrics and their impact on customer service quality.

 

Most organisations measure customer service performance using numbers like interaction volume, typical conversation time, and completion percentages. These targets completely conflict with delivering excellent customer service.

 

Once you tell customer service staff that they need handle specific quantities of contacts per hour, you're fundamentally telling them to speed through customers off the line as rapidly as achievable.

 

That creates a basic opposition: you need good service, but you're encouraging speed over quality.

 

I worked with a major lending company in Sydney where support people were expected to resolve contacts within an standard of four minutes. 240 seconds! Try walking through a complex account problem and offering a adequate resolution in less than five minutes.

 

Not feasible.

 

Consequently was that people would alternatively speed through conversations lacking adequately comprehending the problem, or they'd pass people to various other departments to escape lengthy conversations.

 

Client happiness was awful, and staff satisfaction was worse still.

 

The team collaborated with executives to redesign their assessment measurements to focus on customer satisfaction and single interaction resolution rather than quickness. True, this meant less interactions per day, but customer satisfaction increased significantly, and employee stress amounts decreased notably.

 

The point here is that you won't be able to disconnect customer service standards from the business frameworks and targets that govern how employees function.

 

After decades of experience of working in this field, I'm convinced that support doesn't come from about educating employees to be interpersonal victims who absorb endless amounts of public abuse while staying positive.

 

Quality support is about building environments, processes, and workplaces that empower capable, properly equipped, emotionally healthy employees to fix legitimate issues for reasonable people while maintaining their own mental health and your company's standards.

 

All approaches else is just expensive performance that helps organizations feel like they're solving client relations challenges without really resolving underlying causes.

 

 

If you have any kind of questions concerning where and ways to use Dealing with Customers Training, you could call us at our website.

Website: https://acustomerservicetrainingprogram.bigcartel.com/product/workplace-planning

---

Forums

Topics Started: 0

Replies Created: 0

Forum Role: Participant