Profile

Registered: 5 months ago

Customer Service Training: Building Confidence and Communication Skills

 

Stop Hiring Nice People for Customer Service: How Personality Trumps Agreeableness Every Time

 

I'm about to share something that will most likely annoy every HR professional who sees this: recruiting people for customer service because of how "nice" they appear in an meeting is among of the biggest errors you can commit.

 

Pleasant gets you minimal results when a person is screaming at you about a problem that was not your fault, demanding solutions that do not exist, and stating to ruin your reputation on online platforms.

 

What is effective in those encounters is toughness, professional limit-establishing, and the skill to keep focused on outcomes rather than feelings.

 

The team learned this lesson the hard way while working with a large commercial chain in Melbourne. Their selection process was entirely centered on selecting "service-minded" candidates who were "inherently friendly" and "loved helping people."

 

Appears sensible, doesn't it?

 

Their result: extremely high turnover, ongoing time off, and client experience that was consistently average.

 

After I investigated what was going on, I learned that their "pleasant" employees were becoming completely destroyed by demanding people.

 

These employees had been selected for their natural compassion and desire to please others, but they had zero training or natural protection against internalizing every customer's bad feelings.

 

Additionally, their genuine inclination to please people meant they were continuously agreeing to demands they had no power to meet, which created even more angry people and additional pressure for themselves.

 

I watched genuinely compassionate people leave after weeks because they struggled to cope with the psychological toll of the role.

 

Meanwhile, the small number of people who succeeded in demanding customer service situations had totally different personalities.

 

Such individuals were not necessarily "agreeable" in the traditional sense. Rather, they were resilient, confident, and at ease with setting boundaries. They genuinely wanted to assist customers, but they additionally had the capacity to say "no" when required.

 

These employees managed to recognize a client's anger without accepting it as their responsibility. They were able to remain professional when clients got unreasonable. They were able to concentrate on discovering realistic solutions rather than getting involved in emotional arguments.

 

These traits had little to do with being "pleasant" and everything to do with mental strength, professional confidence, and coping ability.

 

The team totally redesigned their hiring approach. Instead of searching for "nice" candidates, we commenced evaluating for emotional strength, problem-solving capacity, and comfort with boundary-setting.

 

During interviews, we offered people with typical support situations: angry people, impossible expectations, and circumstances where there was absolutely no complete solution.

 

Rather than asking how they would ensure the person pleased, we questioned how they would navigate the scenario appropriately while protecting their own emotional stability and maintaining organizational standards.

 

The people who performed most effectively in these scenarios were rarely the ones who had initially come across as most "agreeable."

 

Alternatively, they were the ones who demonstrated clear reasoning under challenging conditions, ease with saying "I can't do that" when necessary, and the ability to differentiate their individual reactions from the person's mental situation.

 

Six months after establishing this new selection approach, staff turnover dropped by nearly three-fifths. Service quality improved considerably, but additionally significantly, happiness particularly with demanding customer encounters got better remarkably.

 

Let me explain why this method is effective: support is basically about solution-finding under pressure, not about being universally appreciated.

 

Clients who contact customer service are typically beforehand annoyed. They have a problem they cannot solve themselves, they've frequently previously worked through multiple solutions, and they need effective assistance, not superficial agreeableness.

 

That which upset clients really require is someone who:

 

Validates their issue promptly and accurately

 

Demonstrates genuine skill in comprehending and handling their issue

 

Gives clear information about what might and will not be done

 

Accepts suitable measures efficiently and follows through on commitments

 

Maintains professional behavior even when the person gets upset

 

Observe that "agreeableness" does not feature anywhere on that list.

 

Effectiveness, professionalism, and consistency count much more than pleasantness.

 

Moreover, excessive pleasantness can actually be counterproductive in support interactions. When people are truly frustrated about a significant issue, overly positive or enthusiastic reactions can appear as uncaring, insincere, or insensitive.

 

We worked with a investment company company where client relations staff had been trained to continuously display "upbeat demeanor" regardless of the person's situation.

 

That approach worked adequately well for standard inquiries, but it was totally unsuitable for serious issues.

 

When people contacted because they'd been denied large quantities of money due to processing errors, or because they were facing economic crisis and needed to explore repayment alternatives, forced positive responses came across as uncaring and wrong.

 

The team taught their staff to match their interpersonal tone to the seriousness of the client's issue. Significant problems needed serious, competent treatment, not forced cheerfulness.

 

Customer satisfaction increased right away, notably for complex situations. Clients sensed that their issues were being treated with proper attention and that the people helping them were skilled professionals rather than just "pleasant" employees.

 

This brings me to a different important point: the difference between compassion and emotional taking on.

 

Effective support staff require empathy - the capacity to understand and acknowledge another person's emotions and viewpoints.

 

But they certainly do under no circumstances require to absorb those feelings as their own.

 

Interpersonal absorption is what takes place when client relations people commence feeling the same anger, worry, or distress that their clients are going through.

 

This emotional taking on is remarkably overwhelming and contributes to burnout, reduced performance, and problematic turnover.

 

Professional empathy, on the other hand, permits staff to recognize and respond to people's emotional requirements without taking ownership for solving the customer's mental condition.

 

Such separation is essential for maintaining both work competence and mental wellbeing.

 

So, what should you screen for when selecting support people?

 

First, psychological awareness and toughness. Search for candidates who can remain calm under stress, who don't take client frustration personally, and who can differentiate their own reactions from other people's emotional situations.

 

Next, analytical capacity. Support is essentially about understanding challenges and discovering effective fixes. Search for candidates who handle difficulties logically and who can reason effectively even when interacting with emotional people.

 

Furthermore, confidence with standard-maintaining. Look for people who can communicate "no" professionally but firmly when required, and who recognize the difference between remaining helpful and being manipulated.

 

Fourth, genuine engagement in solution-finding rather than just "accommodating people." The best customer service people are energized by the professional challenge of fixing difficult issues, not just by a desire to be liked.

 

Lastly, professional self-assurance and inner strength. Client relations representatives who respect themselves and their job knowledge are significantly more effective at maintaining professional relationships with customers and offering reliably excellent service.

 

Remember: you're not selecting candidates to be professional friends or emotional comfort providers. You're hiring skilled service providers who can deliver outstanding service while protecting their own wellbeing and upholding reasonable expectations.

 

Recruit for effectiveness, strength, and professionalism. Niceness is optional. Work excellence is crucial.

 

 

If you enjoyed this write-up and you would certainly such as to receive more information concerning Building Self Esteem Training kindly see the website.

Website: https://whatisbusinessetiquetteaustrian.bigcartel.com/product/what-is-business-etiquette-austrian

---

Forums

Topics Started: 0

Replies Created: 0

Forum Role: Participant